Your interesting article on self-certification (5 October, page 41) raised the question of whether the UK construction industry was efficient enough to take on self-certification?
Arguably, some large contractors and developers are. Many building control officers know that when projects get past the plans approval stage the site inspections are just a formality. Third-party checking really comes in when an architect relies on an inspector’s experience to see a way out of a problem. So even in the case of the largest developments and best contractors, building control still has a valuable role. Astute inspectors capitalise on this by selling themselves as being “part of the design team”, as in the Foster + Partners building mentioned.
However, not all contractors are geared up for self-certification. Ȧ control has vast experience of problems with speculative housebuilders, for example, even where insurance and warranty schemes are in place.
Wasn’t it Egan who said of the UK construction industry: “Five per cent is world class. The rest is total crap”? In my opinion, site inspection self-certification could work with a select few. But I do think building control expertise really comes in at the design stage. This I feel is where the value really lies.
Iain Allars, Ȧ Control, London Borough of Lambeth
No comments yet